Dana says: Caveat Emptor- Its
almost unfair for me to rate this book as I found much of it to be over
my head. When I bought it I thought I was basically buying myself a lit
101 class in book form but after having finished it I saw that I took the wrong class!
The first part defines literature theory and literature criticism and then defines things such as theme, form, plot, motif, narrators, characterizations, imagery, and figurative language. All good stuff.
The second part moves on to discussing how we read and takes a look at the different schools of thought- New Criticism versus Old Criticism, Russian Formalism, and Reader-Response Criticism and then ends with Aristotle and neoclassicists. All very interesting.
The third part is where I started to get lost. The best way I can describe it is to say parts 3-6, which is the remainder of the book, is like reading about how people read and interpret books through their particular worldview. Plato is discussed first and then it goes on to the Romantics, Marx, Freud, Saussure, Feminists, Gender and Queer theory, Ethnic studies, Disability Studies, Structuralism, Deconstruction, Psychology, Cultural Studies, Historical Studies, Post-colonial Criticism, and then ends abruptly with Ecocriticism. Most of these sections were quite philosophical to me and hard to understand. But the gist of it to me seemed like all these critics are reading all these things into books whether the author meant it or not.
The overall worldview of this book is quite different from my own and I disagreed with the vast majority of it. However, this was for the most part an interesting read and opened my eyes to a number of things I was quite unfamiliar with. My favorite part of the book was definitely the chapter dealing with Aristotle and his views on reading, in particular on reading for fun and intellectual profit and his teaching on catharsis. I am in hearty agreement with Aristotle and his friends who believe that "when it comes to imaginative literature, our time is best spent with works that both delight and instruct." The chapter on Aristotle alone was worth the price I paid for the book.
